Physical Parameters AssessmentInvestigator Name(s): Charlotte Central School - GCalviCollection Date & Time: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 - 10:45amSchool: Charlotte Central SchoolWatershed: Otter/Lewis BasinRiver: Lewis CreekMonitoring Site: Lewis CreekSurrounding Development or Land Use: ResidentialForestRoad Along BankDo you see any pipes entering into the river?: NoIs there a water treatment plant upstream?: NoCanopy Cover: 0-25%Water Appearance: ClearCloudyGreenMuddyWater Odor: Rotten EggsAverage Embeddedness: 26-50%Average Velocity: 2.30m/sExact LocationLatitude: 44.33Longitude: -73.11WeatherPresent: OvercastPast 48 Hours: Clear/SunnyOvercastShowersAverage Transparency/Turbidity No Impact: >60 cm - 17cm = 0-50 ntu Possible Impact: 17 - 8cm = 65-150 ntu Impacted: 8 - < 6 cm = >150 ntu Height of Water Column: 63.00cmTurbidity: 10.00NTU Chemical AssessmentAverage Temperature: 19.00°CAverage pH: 7.40Average Orthophosphate PO4-3: 0.02mg/LAverage Dissolved Oxygen: 4.00mg/L Stream Habitat AssessmentStreambed Composition: Mixture of cobbles, gravels, and sand (3)Streambank Stability: Moderately stable banks – some areas of erosion visible (1)Deepest pool is at least: Knee deep (1)Velocity: Fast – quickly takes objects downstream (2)Riparian Vegetation: Mixture of trees, shrubs, and grasses (3)Riparian Vegetative Zone Width: Buffer zone is between 25 and 50 feet (1)Streambed CoverRock ledges: 1Submerged logs, stumps, or tree roots: 1Large rocks: 0Artificial objects: 0Other: 0Stream Habitat Quality ScoreCalculated by adding all of the points from the above fields. 18-22 (Excellent) 11-17 (Good) 6-10 (Fair) 0-5 (Poor)Stream Habitat Quality Score for This Report: 13 Biological AssessmentPT Group 1 (Intolerant)# of Taxa: 0PT Group 2 (Moderately Intolerant)Damselfly Nymph: 1Dragonfly Nymph: 1Scud: 1Cranefly Larvae: 1Clams/Mussels: 1# of Taxa: 5PT Group 3 (Fairly Tolerant)Midges: 1# of Taxa: 1PT Group 4 (Very Tolerant)# of Taxa: 0Pollution Tolerance Index RatingCalculated as follows: 4*(# of Taxa in PT Group 1) + 3*(# of Taxa in PT Group 2) + 2*(# of Taxa in PT Group 3) + 1*(# of Taxa in PT Group 4) 23+ (Excellent) 17-22 (Good) 11-16 (Fair) 0-10 (Poor) PTI Rating for This Report: 17.00